by Jaime Trosper August 13, 2017 Space
In Brief
Most of the planets within our own solar system have their own moons. Exomoons, like exoplanets, exist outside our solar system, but we haven't been able to find any yet.

Long before the dawn of recorded history, inhabitants of Earth have been influenced and inspired by Luna — the true name of our planet’s largest natural satellite. Until the early 17th century, it was the only moon known to exist, but now, hundreds have been found. Jupiter and Saturn alone have over 100. Even the dwarf planet Pluto has several.

Waterworld With Moons
A view of a hypothetical ocean exoplanet with moons. Image Credit: Luciano S. Méndez/Wikimedia

The basic point is: moons don’t seem to be the exception, but the rule. Of the nine primary planets, only the two innermost planets — Mercury and Venus — don’t have them.  It stands to reason that they exist beyond our small corner of the galaxy.

Where is Waldo?

To find planets, astronomers rely on a few different techniques. One of the most common is called the radial velocity method (otherwise known as Doppler spectroscopy). To summarize, it monitors the spectral lines of stars, watching for changes in frequencies.

As happens with the Sun and the planets in our solar system, other stars with planets will move in their own small orbit in response to the planet(s) gravity, causing the star to wobble.

This leads to variations in the speed at which the star moves towards or away from Earth. The radial velocity can be deduced from displacement in the parent star’s spectral lines due to the Doppler effect, which is the change in frequency of a wave for an observer moving relative to the source of the wave.

Radial Velocity Method
The radial velocity method conceptualized. Image Credit: Las Cumbres Observatory.

The radial velocity method measures these variations in order to confirm the presence of the planet(s).

However, given the challenges already presented (after all, it is distance reliant), it would prove wholly ineffective for exomoon hunters. Specifically, the combined effects of both objects — the planet and its moon(s) — would make them indistinguishable from one another, appearing as a singular entity instead.

Alternatively, there is the transit method: a technique that entails scouring the sky looking for blips in a star’s luminosity — changes that could indicate that something (say, a planet) is obstructing a little bit of light. Astronomers posit that exomoons could appear if we look closely, but naturally, that would come with its own set of limitations.

Stars are so incredibly large and bright, planets hardly register in comparison. Therefore, the blips in light are typically minuscule. Now, imagine how much light an object only a fraction of the moon’s size would obstruct.

Based on these factors alone, it probably shouldn’t come as any surprise to learn that exomoons are elusive little buggers, begging the question:

Have We Found One?

As of now, no definitive proof has emerged. However, there are a few candidates. One, from the J1407 system, is located around 400 light-years from Earth, and is believed to have 80 percent of its mass. Of course, one interpretation of the evidence yields a much different conclusion: that we are dealing with a binary system (a brown dwarf, or failed star, and a smaller planetary companion) — not an exomoon. I suppose that hinges on the core definition and size requirements for objects that straddle the line between planet and moon.

Wasp-12b — the infamous exoplanet that’s basically hell incarnate — is another candidate. Some astronomers suggest that some of its strange characteristics may, in fact, indicate that it has its own moon.

Ultimately, neither of these candidates are particularly promising. Still, one might be the first known exomoon.

First discovered back in 2011, and described in a 2013 paper, the candidate was found using a microlensing event — whereby a distant object is magnified by the distortion of spacetime predicted by Einstein. Observations revealed that the brightness of the lensed star increased 70 times over, followed by a smaller discrepancy. This, to them, could be the work of an exomoon; the same rules must still be applied (meaning, the cause and effect might have nothing to do with it).

Astronomers have already upped the ante with the Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler (HEK) initiative. They believe that by searching through Kepler’s data archives, exomoons may pop out. So our search has just begun.